Talk:RMI-IIOP

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computer science Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Confusing

I found the first paragraph unreadable, it could use some cleanup. No matter how technical an article, the first paragraph should be readable. Let the following paragraphs become abstruse. Mathiastck 18:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I too have a hard time with this article. It assumes too much background knowledge. It has no general discussion about what this protocol is, what various forms it takes, what it's used for, it's history, etc. I already know a little bit about them and use them but came here to learn something more and went away without the info I was looking for. Dougher 04:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the example on this page presents a somewhat distorted view of RMI-IIOP. The whole idea of RMI-IIOP is to use RMI syntax during development without catering for CORBA, and to only factor in the underlying IIOP mechanism using the "-iiop" switch of the rmic compiler. The given example may be working as is (didn't try), but it does not represent the intended benefit of RMI-IIOP. It's more like an example of using CORBA in Java.

See http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/rmi-iiop/tutorial.html for a better example.

NPOV

I don't think the following sentence has a neutral point of view--it sounds like marketing puffery:

The joint work by Sun and IBM to implement Object Management Group (OMG) standards demonstrates the spirit of collaboration that continually moves the Java platform forward. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.240.243.170 (talk) 17:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Source of that article

This "article" has been copied and pasted as it is from Sun's Information about RMI-IIOP. Therefore it's not surprising that it's pro-Sun :) --87.79.69.45 (talk) 12:41, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]