Talk:Rangiya

Lower Assam Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lower Assam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lower Assam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lower AssamWikipedia:WikiProject Lower AssamTemplate:WikiProject Lower AssamLower Assam articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Assam / Geography Stub‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Assam (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 00:27, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rangiya → Rangia – Spelling of place name is Rangia, as specified in government records. There is an existing redirect Rangia and please move this to that name Marlisco (talk) 05:13, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support - more common in English and the official name. Bobby Martnen (talk) 15:31, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - As an native of Kamrup region where Rangiya is also located, i can say that spelling "Rangiya" is more consistent with native pronounciation. Here is the important local and national dailies with others using the same:

So do you mean to oppose this or just to comment? Imc (talk) 18:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - the existing name is the standard in RS. Search books with a disambiguation (necessary to filter out references to other uses of the names including the shellfish Rangia) gives rangia assam 1740 hits and rangiya assam 3150 hits. Imc (talk) 18:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that all the external links given above are from Indian newspapers. Indian newspapers don't usually follow any policy regarding English spellings of place names. It would be a better if the editor has pointed out any government websites using the spelling, Rangiya.

Except Indian railways no other government bodies use the spelling Rangiya. Moreover the dual spellings of English place names in India is a common feature and is the most inconvenient aspect in digitisation drive.
Even in Wikipedia there exist two different spellings. So kindly decide/debate either of this spellings and unify it. Let that unification begins with Wikipedia.
I cannot agree with भास्कर् Bhagawati as this is not a feature unique with this name. In fact most of the Indian names on romanising has this issue and usually ia is preferred over iya. We can debate on this but I hope there will be no dispute on the need for unification of spellings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marlisco (talk • contribs) 06:45, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Imc I surely oppose. भास्कर् Bhagawati Speak 22:25, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Marlisco I invite you to see Assamese spelling of Rangiya anywhere, its ends with Ya represented in English by Y. भास्कर् Bhagawati Speak 23:19, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Rangia or Rangiya is a town.

According to Rangia municipality board Rangia is a city Rangia Municipality board webpage:- http://www.rangiamb.org.in/about%20Us.php AMNR0011 (talk) 19:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another reference:-

https://www.sentinelassam.com/assam-election-2021/constituencies/phase2/rangia-530243 Where it is clearly mentioned that Rangia is a town. AMNR0011 (talk) 19:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rangia is a garden valley town

@AMNR0011 Rangia is garden valley town . please check the photo i uploaded on the rangia Wikipedia page & don't remove "garden valley" text on the rangia Wikipedia page 🙏🙏🙏 Rangia City Editor (talk) 13:51, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rangia City Editor Okay, Val val picture upload kora ai article tut Rangia related, aru xei newspaper r image tu remove kora. AMNR0011 (talk) 14:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Remove korisu diok Rangia City Editor (talk) 07:15, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rangia City Editor Thank you. AMNR0011 (talk) 09:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rangiya Junction is 4th Biggest Railway Station

proof Rangiya Junction is 4th biggest railway station Rangia City Editor (talk) 06:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AMNR0011 Rangia Junction is the 4th biggest railway station in assam please check the picture I uploaded on the Rangiya Wikipedia page & don't remove the text "Rangiya Junction is the 4th Biggest Railway Station in Assam Rangia City Editor (talk) 06:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rangia City Editor "YouTube and other video-sharing sites are generally not considered reliable sources because anyone can create or manipulate a video clip and upload without editorial oversight, just as with a self-published website. However, official channels of notable organizations, such as Monty Python's channel, may be acceptable as primary sources if their authenticity can be confirmed, or as a secondary source if they can be traced to a reliable publisher." To establish the accuracy of your information, it's necessary to present a dependable source. Reliable sources for Wikipedia include books, news, websites, magazines, journals, and research papers. For more information- Wikipedia:Reliable source examples,

Wikipedia:Citing sources

AMNR0011 (talk) 07:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rangia City Editor Please refrain from directly uploading pictures to the main article in order to support your claim. Instead, consider adding the picture to the article's talk page, along with any supplementary information, to encourage discussion and verification. This approach ensures compliance with Wikipedia's standards. Please feel free to offer additional details according to the appropriate guidelines.

AMNR0011 (talk) 07:19, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the YouTube channel (Facts Market GLP) source, it might not be reliable for Wikipedia due to the lack of editorial oversight and credibility. Consider using more reputable sources like established news organizations, academic publications, books, or official websites. AMNR0011 (talk) 07:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]