Talk:Real bills doctrine

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 1 June 2020 by reviewer Robert McClenon (talk · contribs).

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Review Comments[edit]

Help is needed in formatting indented long quotations[edit]

Please correct my futile attempts at doing this kind of indenting.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 19:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT MERGE THIS ARTICLE[edit]

I am not an economist, but I am the wife of economist Thomas M. Humphrey, and I have cited some articles and books by him. He has graciously agreed to let me write this article. I am an auto-confirmed editor of Wikipedia and began writing and editing articles in 2014. If anyone thinks of merging my article with some of the other inadequate attempts at writing on the subject, I do not approve that action,Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 19:45, 15 May 2020 (UTC) I copied this message from the Wikipedia Content Resolution but was told that was the wrong place to post it.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 20:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer Note[edit]

This doctrine appears to have been historically important and should be covered by its own article. I will be tagging the article as needing review for tone, but will be accepting the draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:43, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]