Talk:Reflector (antenna)

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for merging with Passive radiator on November 2010. The result of the discussion was No Consensus.

Untitled

hello

i really appriciate the work being done this is really helpful in increasing knowledge..

just wanted to ask in REFLCTOR ANTENNA page...

why do reflector dont absorbs rays incident on it???

is reflector a conductor? if yes conductors are free of EM waves..

please update the information accordingly. by the use of reflector antenna there may be the powerloss occured. if the powerloss of the signals then the strength of it will decrease.then how will we get a noiseless&clear signal at the output.

thank you.

Reply: [08/10/2012] There are many ways of looking at how reflector antenna reflects and radiates through its created aperture. The easiest way to understand it is through using Physical Optics (PO). Firstly yes the surface of the reflector is indeed conductive. Let's say in this case it is a perfect conductor with zero scattering and zero current density on the shadow side of the reflector. The main reflector is then feed EM wave from another antenna or aperture source. These EM waves then creates a current on the reflector. If these currents are then integrated over the surface of the reflector one ends up with a vector potential A. If this vector potential is then differentiated one will find the far field radiation pattern of the antenna.

There is indeed powerless but the beauty of the reflector system is that it radiates/receives (They are reciprocal just like all antennas) these waves in a parallel bundle and not isotropicly, thus providing very very good signal to noise ratios. Which is precisely why reflectors are used when dealing with very small signals with high possibility of noise like astronomy.

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.210.147.75 (talk) 17:30, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Antenna efficiency

The sentence on this in the article is at present meaningless - can it be improved in some way? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historikeren (talk • contribs) 11:41, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I'm also not sure if/how it specifically applies to a reflector.67.167.106.3 (talk) 17:25, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge this page into

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was No Consensus. The merger proposal is not sufficiently formed; editor Chetvorno suggests multiple destination articles without any indication of which one this article should redirect to nor how the content should be divvied up among the destination articles.NukeofEarl (talk) 15:22, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do we need this page? There are already pages on Passive radiators, Parabolic reflectors, Parasitic elements, Reflectors, and all the other concepts referred to here. I suggest this page be merged into these others. --Chetvorno^TALK 16:45, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! Keep them separate. Parabolic reflector is about parabolae, largely at light wavelengths. Reflector is a disambig. Passive radiators and parasitic elements are sufficiently distinct and technically more complex that they'd breach WP:UNDUE to merge them in here. Andy Dingley (talk) 02:04, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not suggesting merging those pages here, I'm suggesting merging this page into the others. There are no WP:UNDUE issues. Also, the few forms of antenna reflectors mentioned in the article do not come anywhere near describing the variety of reflecting elements and surfaces used in modern antennas. To do so would be to duplicate a great deal of content already present in other articles. This topic simply does not merit a separate article. --Chetvorno^TALK 23:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm of the opinion that the page can be useful on its own. The value I see is that it can provide a generalized overview of the subject and link to antenna specific information.67.167.106.3 (talk) 17:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Differentiating antenna reflector devices and antenna reflector components in antennas.

I slightly reorganized the article to differentiate reflector devices and reflector antenna components. This was done by additions. Very few changes were made to existing information (mostly sentence structure). Nothing was removed. I hope this work meets with approval.67.167.106.3 (talk) 17:35, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]