Talk:Reform movement

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Sociology / Social Movements  (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the social movements task force.
 
WikiProject Politics  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Omissions[edit]

This page is missing a lot of significant reform movements.Dfeuer 00:12, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Agreed! I am attempting to fill in some of these, and provide some source citations as I go. Please help, as this is a big subject and an area of widespread ignorance!Fconaway 03:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Title[edit]

Shouldn't this have the title, Reform Movements?Fconaway 03:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Search fields error?[edit]

Although the title of this article certainly appears to be "Reform movement", if you search with the exact search field "Social reform movement 1848" on Google, with Verbatim results, it comes up with "It was Social Reform Movement" as the link text, where the title of the article normally appears.

this may well be a minor mistake and not much to fret over, but I wanted to make sure that if it by any chance wasn't, it would be noted.

Tlongoria2 (talk) 16:29, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Also, if it's 1840-1830 on the 2nd heading under ToC, wouldn't that mean that Birds of America is a relevant but unrelated detail for the bullet-list section Science?

Tlongoria2 (talk) 16:33, 7 November 2016 (UTC)