Talk:Reg Strikes Back

Fair use rationale for Image:Reg strikes back.JPG

Image:Reg strikes back.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opinions by journalists are not facts

There was an edit that had to be removed because it was an opinion. This quoted article was critical of this album and his career. The removed statement says the following: "However, Allmusic's journalist Stephen Thomas Erlewine, noted that "instead of recharging his career, Reg Strikes Back began a dry spell that ran for nearly five years"."

There is nothing further that was stated that supports this statement of a dry spell, hence, it was removed.

My argument about the deletion is as follows. Given the fact that Elton John had a platinum selling album "Sleeping With The Past" (released in 1989) and a double A side single with Healing Hands and Sacrifice in the UK in 1990, this so called dry spell didn't exist. I show my evidence about this on the following links:

http://www.chartstats.com/release.php?release=17463 http://eil.com/shop/moreinfo.asp?catalogid=91510

further articles in Sleeping With The Past can also be checked for validity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.76.185.47 (talk) 22:09, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Release date

Was it really 24th June 1988 or maybe 20th, as it is written here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1988_in_music ? Maciek94.124.18.19 (talk) 10:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Reg Strikes Back. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:46, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]