Talk:Repentless

Repentless has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Repentless is part of the Slayer discography series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 20, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed
April 20, 2016	Featured topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Notability

Despite the album not yet having a name, this article has been cleared as an exception to TenPoundHammer's Law.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:12, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this article is absolutely deemed unnecessary (by group consensus) as of now, please revert it back to user draft status, rather than delete it, because I have put months of hard work into this and would hate to lose all that. Thank you.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 17:45, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Album name

Where is the proof that this album will be called Death Machine? Dennisthemonkeychild (talk) 20:22, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No response so have removed references for now. Media as of today (20 May 2015) still has the album untitled.Dennisthemonkeychild (talk) 11:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Title: Repentless

Does the title "Repentless" even exist as a word? There's not much to find on the internet. There is a connection to the word "unrepentant", which is explained as "feeling or showing no sorrow for wrongdoing" on WordSense.eu. But that's all. The rest is all about Slayer's new record. Any native speakers here, who could write a bit about it?--87.184.140.25 (talk) 09:31, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Asked about the title of SLAYER's forthcoming album, "Repentless", Kerry King said: "I made [the word] up. I didn't realize I made it up. I mean, it seemed like a word to me, and then I looked it up and it wasn't there." Thank you Kerry. --87.184.139.47 (talk) 09:43, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repentless is Slayer's eleventh studio album

If you do not count Undisputed Attitude as an album, it will add up to eleven studio albums. Also, as of January 10th, 2016, it says on SLAYER.NET, the band's official website, that Repentless is their ELEVENTH studio album which leaves Undisputed Attitude out of their studio album lineup. The real history about one of the members band is about the songs, plis searchng ashols.

1. Show No Mercy
2. Hell Awaits
3. Reign In Blood
4. South Of Heaven
5. Seasons In The Abyss
6. Divine Intervention
7. Diabolus In Musica
8. God Hates Us All
9. Christ Illusion
10. World Painted Blood
11. Repentless

2602:306:8B36:D960:C865:29FC:9B06:7130 (talk) 21:34, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GAN

I've nominated this at GAN (a cursory glance and the article looks just fine) despite not being a major contributor. I'm hoping that I and others can work on it to prevent the Slayer topic being demoted (current at WP:FTC). The Rambling Man (talk) 11:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To let you know, I personally dislike Slayer, but I think it'd be a shame for a band of such fame to be brought down from all the incredible work that's been done. That being said, I spy a problem. The first problem I see is that the article's lead looks a little thin. Usually, a one-paragraph lead would fail GA nomination. Do your best to expand it, try taking a few general details from every section (try Endless Forms Most Beautiful (album) for an example - not the best writing itself but it's got good coverage.) dannymusiceditor ^{what'd I do now?} 14:46, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For a start, the lead section need expanding. --Jarodalien (talk) 07:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Repentless. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://sevensisterspost.com/next-is-ne-on-slayers-radar/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:49, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Repentless/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Retrohead (talk · contribs) 14:35, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this as part of the GA cup. I'll ping the main contributor L1A1 FAL to notify him that I'm reviewing this.

First thing I've noticed that the lead doesn't summarize the entire article. It has to be expanded.
Expanded! The Rambling Man (talk) 09:25, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The formatting seems alright, though I suggest to avoid using semicolons for the personnel. The band and the production should be placed in sub-sections.
Tweaked! The Rambling Man (talk) 09:25, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The reference formatting could be improved. I think it's better to write only Loudwire (not Loudwire.com as currently written) because the Wiki article is without the ".com" (and also add a link to its Wiki article). Same thing for Billboard.
Improved! The Rambling Man (talk) 09:25, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Check the external links. You have one dead link and several other that change path and need to be updated.
Fixed! The Rambling Man (talk) 09:25, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You may add another review or two in the "Reception" to better reflect those featured in the table. You also might want to paraphrase a bit of those already there, because they are quite quote-heavy.
Add the most scathing review for balance. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:25, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrohead thanks for your comments. I'll try to address them as soon as I can and I'll also let you know when I think I'm done. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:14, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrohead thanks for your comments and your patience, please let me know if there's anything more you need me to do. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:25, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]