Talk:Revolutions of 1848 in the Italian states

Military history: European / Italian Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Mid‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was don't move, obviously. —Nightstallion (?) 09:28, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Talk:Revolutions of 1848 in the Italian states – Revolutions of 1848 in the Italian states → The Revolutions of 1848 in the Italian states – {Template:Revolutions of 1848 and links on the other 1848 revolutions' articles expect it to be named this way} Anti-Flag 19:13, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Voting

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~

Oppose and the other articles cited should drop their "the" also. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (definite and indefinite articles at beginning of name) for the relevant rule: If the definite or indefinite article article would be capitalized in running text, then include it at the beginning of the page name. Otherwise, do not include it at the beginning of the page name. LuiKhuntek 08:56, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Interesting. The main article of Revolutions of 1848 appears to kick start it with the Sicilian revolution of independence of 1848. I'm about to start that article, but I come here thinking I might find some useful info - not a chance! A bit odd I would have thought, but when you have been writing on Sicilian related matters for so long, you just get used to this sort of thing. Never mind, I'll finish writing my article, and anyone who doesn't like reading about matters relating to Sicily, can simply come here! ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑ - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 05:54, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two years on, and there is still no mention of the Sicilian revolution in 1848. By the way, I agree that the tone of this article is completely inappropriate for for an encyclopaedic entry, and reads more like a Padanian political pamphlet. πιππίνυ δ - (dica) 03:26, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tried to make some edits to amend that. The tone is coming from old-style historians, although most of the facts are historical truths. --Napoletanamente (talk) 02:28, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]