Talk:Rhine capitalism

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 February 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Social market economy.

Economics

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles

Politics

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles

Germany

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles

Untitled

This is poor English, and the meaning is not clear: "Albert maintains for the shaping portions of Rhine capitalism following characteristics:" Can anybody fix or explain what it should be? Are the following characteristics ones that shaped Albert's view (i.e. are they problems he was trying to solve), or are they the actual characteristics of his view (his solution)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philu (talk • contribs) 01:10, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the sentence to: "Albert identifies the following characteristics of Rhine capitalism:". Hopefully that's a bit more clear. The entire entry actually needs a bit of polishing. Wassermensch 12:51, 07 June 2011 (CET)

This is a critical interpretation of Western European economics, not an ideology.

As said above, this is a critical interpretation, and as a criticism it is not an actual ideology.--R-41 (talk) 23:24, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]