Talk:Rhythm & Sound

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 July 2006. The result of the discussion was delete and redirect.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles

Record Labels Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for merging with Basic Channel on 20 January 2020. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was merge.

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was merge. 114.164.76.173 (talk) 12:34, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to merge Rhythm & Sound into Basic Channel. I think that the content in the Rhythm & Sound article can easily be explained in the context of Basic Channel. Rhythm & Sound is a production duo and record label founded by Moritz von Oswald and Mark Ernestus, who are better known as Basic Channel. The result of the 2006 AfD discussion was "delete and redirect". 114.178.9.139 (talk) 21:36, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Merge The label is basically an extension of the Basic Channel discography, and can be addressed there without loss of content. Chubbles (talk) 23:38, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sounds practical gentlecollapse6 (talk) 14:57, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.