Jump to content

Talk:Ribble Link

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I'm intrigued by the reference to there having been a chain ferry across the ribble at Freckleton. I grew up in Frecklton and took an interest in local history and can recall no othere reference such a ferry.

I can't think of any point where a road approaches the river that would have been used as an approach to such a ferry.

Downstream of Freckleton Naze there used to be a pub (accessed from Warton) called Guides House named after the guides who would lead foot traffic across the sands. the pub was open into the 1930's (my mother recalls it as a small girl) but closed when Warton aerodrome was built during the war.

Ian King —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.131.202 (talk) 13:32, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Ribble Link flod plain.jpeg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:35, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Ribble Link flood risk.jpeg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:35, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Ribble Link. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

History section

[edit]

This section is written in a very muddled style. In a number of places it is impossible to be sure what is meant. The section needs rewriting by somebody with a good knowledge of the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.198.85.216 (talk) 15:28, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rewriting the article

[edit]

The article has a tag dated May 2022 stating that it needs to be rewritten to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards, as it is poorly written and reads more like an advertisement. I have made a start, by rewriting individual paragraphs either to expand the content or to remove large verbatim quotes from sources, providing better references, and removing small amounts of unintelligible material. I think that much of the Background section should now be moved to the History section. Some of the History section could be moved to the Background section, although much of it seems to have little to do with the Ribble Link, and might be better moved to the Savick Brook article. I have also removed some of the images - does a picture of a bench really help people to understand the subject? I'll press on. Bob1960evens (talk) 16:19, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing text that states the Savick Brook was tidal up to the foot of the 3-rise locks. It is unreferenced, and locks 2 to 6 have a total rise of 31 feet (9.4 m), so it would require tides to be about that much higher than they currently are on a regular basis. Bob1960evens (talk) 07:28, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have finished rewriting the article, in line with the tag. I deleted most of the "More than just a canal" section, because it was intractable, and there are no obvious refs for most of the content. I am therefore removing the tag. Bob1960evens (talk) 23:10, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

[edit]

I have assessed the article against the criteria for B-class.

  • Suitably referenced, with inline citations
  • Reasonable coverage - no obvious omissions or inaccuracies
  • Defined structure, with adequate lead
  • Reasonably well written for grammar and flow
  • Supporting materials - Infobox, map, images
  • Appropriately understandable

Since it meets these, I am changing the rating to B-class. Bob1960evens (talk) 17:14, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ribble_Link&oldid=1209153523"