This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is/was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s) Eringordon will be working on it. KTJeno will be peer reviewing it.
This subject is featured in the Outline of rights, which is incomplete and needs further development. That page, along with the other outlines on Wikipedia, is part of Wikipedia's Outline of Knowledge, which also serves as the table of contents or site map of Wikipedia.
This page was previously nominated to be moved. Before re-nominating, review the move discussions listed below.
Hello Eringordon, I think your addition of the Magna Carta to the list of historical documents that show the evolution of human rights is beneficial to the page. However, one addition that might be useful is to include information on how the Magna Carta influenced later documents, such as the United States Constitution. KTJeno (talk) 00:14, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Right (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. Wbm1058 (talk) 19:51, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
What is the rationale? My sense is the term rights is more of a general conception, while right refers to a specific freedom or entitlement. Like, in the US, a police officer says "read him his rights", while the term right is more often used in a specific instance, such as a right to speak freely or a right to defense counsel. And, if the term "rights" is used in pretty much any sentence, it is referring to what this article is about, so my sense is the current article title is fitting. Wonder what others think.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:00, 14 October 2015 (UTC) So unless there is more of a reason put forth, regarding the requested move, I Oppose.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 08:33, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Agreed with Tom, also c.f. extensive prior discussion about this subject that always come back down to leaving it here. --Pfhorrest (talk) 03:00, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Oppose. The current title adequately disambiguates its subject from other uses of "right" without requiring artificial parenthetical disambiguation. Changing that would require a very good reason, which I don't see here. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 03:38, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Oppose per the above responses. Calidum 03:09, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
There is no mention of religious rights in the template