Talk:Robert T. Pennock

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Creationism: Intelligent design

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Creationism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Creationism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CreationismWikipedia:WikiProject CreationismTemplate:WikiProject CreationismCreationism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Intelligent design task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Philosophy: Philosophers / Science / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Philosophy of science
	Contemporary philosophy

Source

The following is a source, not an external link. It could be placed in a bibliography section, but that's a bit dubious as you end up with a lot of papers. Probably best in a specific page. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 17:23, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Supernaturalist Explanations and the Prospects for a Theistic Science or "How do you know it was the lettuce?" Paper for "Naturalism, Theism and the Scientific Enterprise" Conference, March 1997, The University of Texas at Austin.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Robert T. Pennock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080821193249/http://www.newsroom.msu.edu/site/indexer/2919/content.htm to http://www.newsroom.msu.edu/site/indexer/2919/content.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:48, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pointing out to an educated audience that "intelligent design" isn't science doesn't seem like a noteworthy achievement.

The idea that nearly any and ALL college teachers should have their own Wikipedia page (because they publish in always obscure and often questionable journals?) seems far too deeply entrenched to question.

2602:252:D6A:B2C0:B465:9F07:651D:C765 (talk) 17:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your assessment of Pennock is completely at odds with the well sourced recognition of his achievements in the article. . dave souza, talk 01:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]