Talk:Fur Fighters

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Atomas (0 participants)
PLAY: The Games Festival (1 participant)
FloodSim (1 participant)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (1 participant)
Blast Monkeys (0 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants)
Purple Francis (8 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (4 participants)
Dr. Wily (10 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

Other fur game: Brutal - Paws of Fury for the Sega Genesis

--Abdull 23:17, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there's a link. --Rai 19:25, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The PETA are also intending on making a game called 'Fur Fighters' too. Confusion galore. Melaisis (talk) 21:52, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article is completely biased.

Uber Bear info needed

The phrase 'Uber Bear' redirects to this page, but is not mentioned on the page. Disjointed editing problem. Uber Bear is a Fur Fighters character, but I don't know enough to add details/revert. Centrepull (talk) 19:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Critical Reaction" section

This is a relatively obscure game, so people probably don't care that much, but the "Critical Reaction" section should be lower down the article and it should be titled "Reception" and it should not feature all that unreferenced editorial but quote actual reviews and metacritic scores. Bygberbrown (talk) 00:20, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

This whole article seems to have been written by the developers of the iPad version on 2012-07-20 to advertise its return. Bygberbrown (talk) 00:22, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]