Talk:Rockwell-MBB X-31

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Aviation / Aircraft (Rated C-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 
 
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Tailless?[edit]

Does anyone have a source that shows the tail was actually removed from the second X-31? All the sources I've read (e.g. [1]) seem to imply that the tailless stuff was just a simulation - no change was made to the physical aircraft although it could, in theory, have been done. --Scott Wilson 10:31, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

I agree, I've rewritten it to match the NASA reference. The German article mentions one of the goals was testing flight without rudder and the German reference http://www.waffenhq.de/specials/experimental/x-31.html states the rudder was deactivated, not removed, in the test on 17th March 1993. And the NASA ref explains the quasi tailless tests in 1994.-213.219.184.105 22:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
As an engineer involved in the flight testing at Pax River, I can say that the aircraft was never flown in a tailess configuration. There are numerous artistic concept and photoshop doctored images of the aircraft shown without it's tail but this structural alteration was never performed. As mentioned above the quasi tailess flights may have been performed however the tail was left intact so the maneuvering would have been done through using the thrust vectoring capabilities and control surfaces other than the rudder. -5/18/2007 MCK

comparable aircraft[edit]

shouldent planes like the j-10 be added? the Chengdu J-10, IAI Lavi and Eurofighter Typhoon all look simillar to this plane, should they be included? Btzkillerv (talk) 15:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure. The Chengdu J-10, IAI Lavi, Eurofighter Typhoon, Saab 37 Viggen, Saab 39 Gripen, and Dassault Rafale all have the delta-canard wing configuration like the X-31, but the point of the X-31 is that it is a testbed for thrust vectoring, which none of the above aircraft (as of now) have. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.73.136.240 (talk) 07:15, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Those are all combat aircraft, this is a technology demonstrator. No need to compare them. Perhaps comparing this to the Su-47 is more apt. -SidewinderX (talk) 17:31, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rockwell-MBB X-31. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 22 January 2018 (UTC)