Talk:Rogers Cable
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Rogers Cable.png
[edit]Image:Rogers Cable.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Rogers Yahoo! Hi-Speed Internet.png
[edit]Image:Rogers Yahoo! Hi-Speed Internet.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Rogers Cable.png
[edit]Image:Rogers Cable.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Huntington Beach, California?
[edit]The cable company in Huntington Beach back in the early 80's was Rogers Cable Systems. Is this the same company? I thought they went out of business...Cousert (talk)
Page Retirement
[edit]Hello, this is @Rogers_Chris and I work on the social media team at Rogers. This page should be retired. A great deal of info is out of date, but most glaring is that we no longer operate Rogers Cable separate from Rogers Communications.
At the very least, the line "The company employs traffic shaping and has been widely criticized for this" needs to be updated to reflect that Rogers stopped managing P2P filesharing traffic as of December 2012[1].
References
- ^ "Rogers Network Management Policy". Rogers.com. Rogers Communications.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Rogers Cable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090915190354/http://www.cbc.ca:80/money/story/2009/09/10/rogers-shaw-mountain-cablevision.html? to https://web.archive.org/web/20090914044640/http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2009/09/10/rogers-shaw-mountain-cablevision.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Rogers Cable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20000301153303/http://www.rogerstelevision.com/ to http://www.rogerstelevision.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:28, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Help
[edit]Cable internet an phones are out Linda Perley (talk) 18:02, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Our internet cable an phones are down Linda Perley (talk) 18:03, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- This is the Wikipedia entry for Rogers Cable; for issues with their service you'll need to contact them. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 01:54, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Subsidiary or Division?
[edit]I am deeply confused. It's listed as a Subsidiary on its parent company's page. However, on this page it is listed as a Division. Could someone please help me find out what it is? For an image description of what is happening, click the link here: [1] WiinterU (talk) 03:23, 28 October 2023 (UTC)