Talk:Rupandehi District
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
- This stub is about one of the districts of Nepal, and is based basically on the information available with Districts of Nepal. The stub has certainly the potential for further development by incorporating information on several aspects, including the following:
Origin of name – History – Geography – Economy – Sub-divisions – Transport – Demographics – Culture - Flora and fauna- Education – Media – Sports. Wherever required/ possible, Notes/ External links/ Further reading/ References may also be given. I invite all interested editors to collaborate. Thanks. --61.247.245.46 15:27, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
Sined above: --Bhadani 15:38, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- A request to all the editors interested in developing the contents of one or more districts of Nepal – please suggest on the talk page of WikiProject Nepal districts. --Bhadani 15:08, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Rupandehi District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://cbs.gov.np:80/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/National%20Report.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:00, 2 April 2016 (UTC)