Talk:São Tomé and Príncipe at the 2004 Summer Olympics
Appearance
![]() | São Tomé and Príncipe at the 2004 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 15, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:São Tomé and Príncipe at the 2004 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
I think I'll have this completed by tomorrow JAGUAR 15:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Initial comments
[edit]- The lead should be expanded to reach a minimum of two paragraphs so it can comply per WP:LEAD and also help with the organisation of this article
Done. I did make some changes to the last paragraph. Let me know that the edits were OK.
- "Usually, an NOC would be able to enter three qualified athletes" - a NOC, or even "the" would work
- Again it shoudl be explained what the "A" and "B" standards for athletes? This should be explained somewhere in the article for people unfamiliar
Done
- This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as the GA critera 3(a) is looking for. I would recommend any small expansion if possible but if this is not possible I'm willing to let this go as I believe the reliable sources implemented in this article are make it broad as it is
- Expanded it a bit. Sadly I couldn't find as much infomation as I did with Vanuatu at the 2004 Summer Olympics.
References
[edit]On hold
[edit]Sorry this took so long. Much like the last article this is a compact article despite the short review, so I'll leave this on hold until everything can be clarified. Again I suggested an expansion of the lead and anywhere else in the article (if possible) as it may not meet the broadness part of the criteria. But let me know if you have any questions, good luck JAGUAR 12:40, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Jaguar: Thanks for the review. I could not find as much infomation as I did with Vanuatu at the 2004 Summer Olympics sadly. Still, I managed to expand it a bit, so I hope this now meets the GA criteria. Good888 (talk) 13:52, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks again! You've done a good job with this article and with that it now meets the GA criteria, well done
JAGUAR 19:13, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks again! You've done a good job with this article and with that it now meets the GA criteria, well done
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- GA-Class Olympics articles
- Mid-importance Olympics articles
- WikiProject Olympics articles
- GA-Class Africa articles
- Low-importance Africa articles
- GA-Class Sao Tome and Principe articles
- Low-importance Sao Tome and Principe articles
- WikiProject Sao Tome and Principe articles
- WikiProject Africa articles