Talk:SS El Oriente
Appearance
![]() | SS El Oriente has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 15, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 1910 American cargo ship SS El Oriente was chartered by the Red Cross and was one of fourteen ships that sailed under the Swiss flag during World War II? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:SS El Oriente/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 19:33, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- The last three paragraphs of the "World War I" section are fairly short. Can they be combined in any way?
- How does it look now?
- In the lead, you say the ship was built in 1910 twice.
- I removed the second one.
- In the "World War II" section, third paragraph, you say "often by performed by Soviet women and political prisoners". Should the first "by" be removed?
- Yes it should :) , and now is removed.
- In the "Red Cross ship" section, you have a set of refs out of numerical order.
- Good catch. I think that was an artifact of the Did You Know? process.
- The last three paragraphs of the "World War I" section are fairly short. Can they be combined in any way?
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- In the "World War I" section, fourth paragraph, the last sentence needs a ref
- Added.
- In the "World War I" section, fourth paragraph, the last sentence needs a ref
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Another nice article. I'm putting it on hold to allow time to address the few concerns I detailed above. Dana boomer (talk) 19:52, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Replies above. — Bellhalla (talk) 20:15, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Everything looks good - I'm passing the article. Dana boomer (talk) 20:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- GA-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War I articles
- World War I task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- GA-Class Switzerland articles
- Low-importance Switzerland articles
- All WikiProject Switzerland pages