Talk:Sable Systems

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Opening comment

reasons for hangon importance:
-worldwide operation,
-strongly connected to scientific fields covered in wikipedia respirometry and the respective community (this being an area were wikipedia is actually used by students totally new to the field,
-mentioned in article for long time (and not by me),
-a few similar companies should also be covered

however: points for lack of importance:
-small,
-not "popular culture" but "scientific culture" therefore small minority interest

so also good arguments for deletion, please go ahead as you feel right (saves me a lot of time with the similar ones). greetings and thanks for your comment faramir 20:49, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm willing to give it a chance, but I've tagged the article as "unreferenced" instead. Please add some independent third party references to support notability; the article can still be deleted if this isn't done within a reasonable timeframe. Bearcat (talk) 22:43, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added a citation from a book but the ultimate independent third party reference for the statement 'they produce this equipment and it is used by scientist' is of course the primary literature. In their case this amounts to 1040 citations as just checked by Google Scholar. On way out out could be to add just one citation from a very high reputation journal. In this case 'G.S.B. Suh, A.M. Wong, A.C. Hergarden, J.W. Wang, A.F. Simon, S. Benzer, R. Axel, D. Anderson, 'A single population of olfactory sensory neurons mediates an innate avoidance behavior in Drosophila', Nature 431 (2004): 854-859.' would be a good candidate but it does not really say anything more than the others (we did this measurements using the instrument from that company). It is only in a more famous journal. So, I dont know. What do you think?

faramir 20:44, 31 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Faramir333 (talk • contribs)