Talk:Sandhikharka

Sandhikharka was nominated as a Geography and places good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 22, 2008). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Sandhikharka was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 25, 2008). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

A fact from Sandhikharka appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 August 2008, and was viewed approximately 229 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Maoist rebels and Nepali government forces engaged in four attacks in Sandhikharka between 2002 and 2005?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/August.

Wikipedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sandhikharka/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

This article does not yet have the level of detail necessary for a Good Article. There has to be more information about the town than a history that starts in 2002 and a couple sentences on the geography and demographics. While they're not going to be directly applicable, you can check out WP:UKCITY or WP:USCITY for ideas on what else to include. As the article stands, it definitely fails the GA criteria that an article be broad in coverage. Best, epicAdam^(talk) 22:15, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. This is not the UK or US, it's nepal. Information is extremely hard to come by. I'm renomming. Your friend Eddy O. D. Wiki^{[citation needed]} 23:30, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Sandhikharka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sandhikharka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20041125120215/http://www.nepalnews.com.np:80/contents/englishdaily/ktmpost/2002/sep/sep10/index.htm to http://www.nepalnews.com.np/contents/englishdaily/ktmpost/2002/sep/sep10/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]