Talk:Santa Claus Bank Robbery

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Holidays: Christmas Low‑importance

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Christmas task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Christianity: Christmas Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Christmas task force (assessed as Low-importance).

really?

Is this supposed to be a wiki article or storytelling? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.18.240.18 (talk) 08:19, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Please help cite! All sources are listed at the end of the article. Hondo 17:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Poor writing for an encyclopedia entry

This article reads more like a book/story than an actual article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:2C12:5600:F91A:CE94:F890:45B (talk) 20:47, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Santa Claus Bank Robbery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://web2.unt.edu/untpress/catalog/detail.cfm?ID=123
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.our-town.com/~brit/cisco.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:48, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Major Updates to Sources

Hi All, I am new to Wikipedia editing, so feedback is appreciated. I just made some major edits to the Wikipedia entry on The Santa Claus Bank Robbery. The edits include:

(1) Better wording than the original entry (in my view), making it more suitable for an encyclopedia entry.

(2) About four times the number of citations than the article originally had (linking directly to newspapers of the 1920s and 1930s and not just recent accounts).

(3) A listing of various treatments of this story across the years, in chronological order.

Again, I welcome feedback. Tomgoodmanauthor (talk) 00:24, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]