Talk:Saxe-Weimar

Germany Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Former countries: Holy Roman Empire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
	This article is supported by the Holy Roman Empire task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	An editor has requested that a flag image be added to this article and placed within the infobox.

European history Mid‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have removed almost all of the text (which I previously posted) because it quoted extensively from an on-line source of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica, and the on-line entity claims copyright on the material. I am completely rewriting the article based on new research. I hope to have the replacement text up in a day or two. - Dalbury 18:51, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have completely rewritten the article. - Dalbury 02:36, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Found the map in the Spanish article on Saxe-Weimar. - Dalbury 19:03, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comments

I added this to the "former countries" project as well. Needs more info here, basically the claim to fame, what were the problems, what is some of the history, not simply of the dynasty and its claims on the state, but where it fit into the big HRE picture, during, for example, Reformation, 30 Years wars, trade, economy, etc. I suggest sections on Dynasty, History (sub divided by era or century), Early Modern Economy, Social Anatomy, or some such divisions. --Auntieruth55 (talk) 21:55, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What's with the French name?

Why is it that we, in English, call this state "Saxe-Weimar" when the German is "Sachsen-Weimar"? After all, we don't call the German state "Sachsen" "Saxe" in English. We call it "Saxony". So, why not in this case? What is the historical reason for this inconsistency? Poldy Bloom (talk) 01:14, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Saxe-Weimar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051205094521/http://www.bartleby.com/65/sa/SaxeWeim.html to http://www.bartleby.com/65/sa/SaxeWeim.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:35, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]