Talk:Schloemer (automobile)

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from Schloemer (automobile) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 July 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Schloemer automobile (pictured), once described by the The Milwaukee Journal as "America's first practical horseless carriage", is now considered to just have been the first car running in Milwaukee?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Schloemer (automobile).

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 23:23, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Fay Cusick with the Schloemer automobile in 1921

... that in 1948, The Milwaukee Journal declared the Schloemer automobile (pictured) to be "America's first practical horseless carriage"? Source: The Milwaukee Journal
- ALT1: ... that in 1995, the Wisconsin State Journal stated that the Schloemer automobile (pictured) was "believed to be the oldest gas car in America"? Source: Wisconsin State Journal
- ALT2: ... that the Schloemer automobile (pictured) was possibly the first automobile to feature a muffler? Source: Wisconsin Society of Automotive Historians
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Cactus fries
- Comment: Claims of the historic importance of the Schloemer automobile have diminished over time.

Created by Michael Barera (talk). Self-nominated at 11:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Schloemer (automobile); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - ?
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Michael Barera: Good article. I just have to ask, what makes the Wisconsin Society of Automotive Historians a reliable source? Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:16, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They are an affiliate of both the Society of Automotive Historians and the Wisconsin Historical Society. Michael Barera (talk) 17:14, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If we're using that as justification then we could consider this reliable. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]