Talk:Scholastic Lutheran Christology

Christianity: Lutheranism High‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Lutheranism (assessed as Top-importance).

POV in twofold state section

The section states that a certain religious doctrine is true and that a certain interpretation of the Bible is right. To me, the very essence of POVness. Please make it more neutral if you know more about theology than I do. -- 85.179.127.44 (talk) 22:48, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Consensus was to not merge.

Extra calvinisticum has been a stub for some time now, and the information found there could be incorporated into this article. To facilitate development of both pages, and provide context for the source page, I recommend a merge. --JFHutson (talk) 14:52, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - This article itself is supposed to be about Scholastic Lutheran Christology, not about Calvinist Christology. The Extra calvinisticum is a Calvinist doctrine, just because the label applied to it originated in Lutheran Scholasticism does not mean that the content belongs in an article about a different system. ReformedArsenal (talk) 14:58, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps communicatio idiomatum is a better place? What we really need is Reformed scholasticism, but I'm not holding my breath. --JFHutson (talk) 15:32, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oppose - I don't think so. The Extra calvinisticum is specifically a denial of the full communicatio idiomatum... that article is not much longer either. Why would we merge an article that is almost the same length and is a denial of the main point of the article, into it? It's fine as a stub as it is. ReformedArsenal (talk) 12:26, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per ReformedArsenal. I would love to see a Reformed scholasticism article. St Anselm (talk) 21:55, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.