This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
The work that went into this article is appreciated, and I am not saying that anything in it is wrong, but in order to comply with the policy of Wikipedia:Verifiability, the article needs to have its references listed. In other words, where can other Wikipedia editors go, in order to verify and doublecheck the information that is in this article? --Elonka20:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know anything about the show - why is this paternity issue more of a spoiler than anything else? Is it a new plot development or something? — Carl (CBM · talk) 13:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah - it's from yesterday's episode. Totally fair to leave the spoiler tag for a week or so, I think. (Not much longer, as soaps tend to be consumed pretty quickly by their fans, but for a bit.) Phil Sandifer04:14, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
