Talk:Scud: The Disposable Assassin

Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Years of production?

What years was the comic in production? That's important information that this (otherwise very complete) article lacks. Fernando Rizo 19:13, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The first issue came out in '94...can't find the date the last one was made, though, so I'm going to hold off adding that. --InShaneee 03:53, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I got the issue in my hands right now. Sez on the inside, 1998. I'm adding it. --Toquinha 02:11, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

- Good work, guys. Fernando Rizo 02:30, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Reason why the page should be deleted

This page should be combined with a similar page or deleted.68.94.224.34 04:18, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Casting suggestions

Why the removal of casting suggestions? They are a feature of every issue of Scud and all of the related spin-offs. --Toquinha 07:09, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They really aren't all that encyclopedic...--InShaneee 21:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and references

This article has no sources or references and according to User:InShaneee, "NOTHING unreferenced can stay, for ANY reason. Period." According to other admins that have posted on ANI, anyone can remove anything that is not sourced or referenced, at any time. Therefore, if no sources or references can be provided for this article, anyone can remove the unsourced material. Am I right or am I wrong? --Candide, or Optimism 22:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're wrong. --InShaneee 22:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, why am I wrong? Those are your words. I'll ask on ANI. --Candide, or Optimism 22:07, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ask away. --InShaneee 22:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Verifiability

According to WP:V:

1. Articles should contain only material that has been published by reputable sources.
2. Editors adding new material to an article should cite a reputable source, or it may be removed by any editor.
3. The obligation to provide a reputable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on those seeking to remove it.

I am challenging the unsourced material of this article. Please include references and sources and link them to the relevant material. If not, anyone - including I - can remove anything and everything unsourced from the article. This according to the official policy of Wikipedia which falls under WP:V. --Candide, or Optimism 22:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The source is the comic books that the article is about. --InShaneee 22:45, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that's a valid source, but if it is, then please add it and we shall see if it counts as a valid source. --Candide, or Optimism 22:47, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...This article is about a comic book series. If it were actually true that comic books couldn't be used as a source, this wouldn't be here in the first place. --InShaneee 22:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then please add the source to the article. --Candide, or Optimism 22:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is ABOUT the source. The comic book series. The whole thing. That's the source. That's all the article is about. --InShaneee 22:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing links

Please tell AdyCarter the guy who works for Minimates to stop removing links that mention these comic's new toylines! He is promoting a toy line called minimates he works for and removing other toy companies mentions from WIKI and that is being a vandel! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.160.7.40 (talk • contribs) 23:04, 8 December 2006

I dont work for any toy companies, its my personal feeling that until these products are actually released or at elast officially solicited to stores they are non encylopedic, I could announce a toyline but it means nothing. Also please note that the above unisgned talk comment is by the owner of ShockerToys who has a long history of having entire Wiki articles removed as he views it as his advertising playground. I'm not removing the line listed as yopur first wave anymore, but plastering your company over every page even vaguely related to a line you may make was rediculous. Adycarter 19:07, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually you would know more then us as you work for Minimates. As far as me I'm a wiki reader from Niagara Falls who is on board to help list info. lease don't dirty me with your crappy one sided opinions. And if something is announced all over the web and in magazines then why should it not be known on Wiki? Brings to mind a few minimates that were anounced and you placed in the wiki page but never saw the light of day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.160.7.40 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 13 December 2006

For the millionth time "I DONT WORK FOR ANY TOY COMPANIES". I still disagree that "intent to make an item" counts as encylopedic, hasnt ShockerToys just un-announced some of the figures you so proudly added to the Wiki? Its interesting that all your edits are ST related and you have exactly the same attitude as the last batch of ST "employees" who spammed Wikipedia. Adycarter 15:51, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually contributing is not spamming! I want it to be known as this is an important event for Indie Comics. Please go promote your minimates and stop editing this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.160.7.40 (talk • contribs) 04:01, 17 December 2006

Someone else is reverting your edits not me. Adycarter 09:49, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Issue #21

On robschrab.com, Schrab has a picture of Scud saying "I'll do it" underneath a title that says "SCUD #21" followed by "more to come." See http://www.robschrab.com/scud-21/ . This is a huge breakthrough, and should possibly be included in the article. However, it may be too flimsy of information provided, though from the author himself. Any feedback? Totenkreuz 13:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The best we could do is include exactly what was posted, with no speculation about what it could mean. This DOES sound cool, though. --InShaneee 13:56, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose of putting Jeff in hospital

On the page, it states "Realizing that he doesn't want to die," but I was under the impression it was due to Scuds being programmed with a sense of self-preservation (so as to win their fights). I can read through to find the reference, but wanted feedback first. (This is my first attempt to edit, and wanted to wade into the talk page first). Willowbl00 (talk) 21:53, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pop culture reference in Dr. McNinja?

Dr. McNinja (by Christopher Hastings) was tutored by a clone of Ben Franklin and they both later confront Zombie Ben Franklin. King Radical's lackey is named Herschel who plays a similar role as his namesake, and I've got a nagging feeling that there are some other hat-tips to Scud in Dr. McNinja. I haven't seen any acknowledgements by Chris Hastings; anyone know more about this? Sjester (talk) 05:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Scud: The Disposable Assassin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:05, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]