Talk:Sentence (liturgy)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sentence (liturgy) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Christianity: Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance).

Primary source

@Pbritti How do you mean “Still WP:PRIMARY”? WP:PRIMARY allows for the use of primary sources:—

A primary source may be used on Wikipedia only to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge.

The existence of the post-communion sentences is a fact that anyone can verify. Steepleman (t) 22:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Steepleman: Your use of primary sources here constitutes original research. We can verify the 1549 BCP contains the two sentences described, but the encyclopedic relevance of these sentences is not defined by the BCP itself. It also leaves out important context (e.g. are these the only relevant sentences in the 1549 Communion office?) and does not verify if the post-communion sentence was actually removed in the 1662 BCP. Indeed, it suggests that the 1662 BCP was the first to remove the post-communion sentence, ignoring that there were three intervening English BCPs and a Scottish one where the change may have occurred first. This is why we prefer not to use primary sources. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please take notice of MOS:CURLY for quotation marks. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will cite a secondary source in addition then. Steepleman (t) 10:47, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]