Talk:Shanghighlander
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from Shanghighlander was copied or moved into Shanghailander with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Shanghailander
[edit]Suggest that the title be Shanghailander rather than Shanghighlander. This is consistent, for instance, with the source Wasserstein, Secret War in Shanghai, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1999. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.210.113.99 (talk) 15:40, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- I agree; "Shanghailander" is the standard usage; see also Robert A. Bickers, "Empire Made Me: An Englishman Adrift in Shanghai" (Columbia, 2003)--BaiGuang (talk) 16:52, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Article title is incorrect. Shanghailander is redirected to History of Shanghai. Shanghailander is a redirection. So this article should ideally be merged with the History of Shanghai or a administrator looks at removing the redirect and to a move request to the proper name. Visik (talk) 02:24, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Subject is suitable for an article, but the title is wrongly spelt: it should be 'Shanghailander'. Furthermore, the article has been edited to include irrelevant material about central European refugees in Shanghai, who were not of 'British descent', i.e. not 'Shanghailanders'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.98.154.125 (talk) 21:50, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Article title is incorrect. Shanghailander is redirected to History of Shanghai. Shanghailander is a redirection. So this article should ideally be merged with the History of Shanghai or a administrator looks at removing the redirect and to a move request to the proper name. Visik (talk) 02:24, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Merge to Shanghailander
[edit]Correct spelling's article had been improperly blanked. I've restored it and moved appropriate material there already. Should be uncontroversial (see discussion above). Just need to have an admin merge the talk and histories. — LlywelynII 11:24, 6 November 2011 (UTC)