This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
in principle im ok with "Track One" leading to the "Track II diplomacy" article, in cases like this here it can be quite misleading tho. it doesnt link to a section but to the article itself, and a difference like between "I" and "II" is so subtle that it is easily missed while skimming (which should be the standard type of consumption here). confusion may be cleared up immediately, though sometimes only later on the original page.
not sure if there ever was a specific discussion about such cases somewhere, or what could be done about it, so just felt like asking here. EnTerbury (talk) 19:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
