Talk:Shasta Costa

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Indigenous peoples of North America Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Merge

(Merge to Confederated Tribes of Siletz? —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-25 02:03Z)

Oppose - There are several bands and tribes in Southwestern Oregon that have their own customs, languages, and practices. To label them under one roof would be limiting the information on them. Ndnguy 19:19, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- For example: Tolowa, a seperate tribe, also had several members taken to the Siletz Reservation - but it warrents its own article, albiet there is more information (as of right now - I don't have the time to add all the information - but will in the coming weeks).Ndnguy 19:21, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-25 02:01Z

Updating with information from Hall 2021 and other recent publications

Hey all, I'm an indigenous linguistics student and I've noticed for a while that the wikipedia space around Oregon Athabaskan languages is somewhat out of date with recent scholarship, particularly in the field on language revitalization. With Jaeci Hall's dissertation published last fall, pointing to many more recent authoritative sources, I think it's a good opportunity to get my hands on some sources, "be bold", and overhaul the presentation of these languages on wikipedia.

The main thing at issue is the dual question of phylogeny and terminology. Hall 2021 and many others in the speaker/language revitalization communities consider Lower Rogue River, Upper Rogue River, and Chetco-Tolowa to be three major dialect groups of one single language, Nuu-wee-ya', rather than separate languages as they're represented here on wkipedia and in older literature. Additionally, while there is not yet and may never be a scholarly consensus due to these being underdocumented language varieties, the breakdown of subdialects represented throughout wikipedia does not align with more recent scholarship, nor is it even internally consistent. Finally, the terminology and orthographies used for languages, dialects and people groups throughout the pages in this space are inconsistent and often unsourced, and links often do not lead where they should.

Over the next few months (vague window of time, highly dependent on other responsibilities) I hope to make significant edits to the following pages to address these three concerns.

Pacific Coast Athabaskan languages
Tututni language (which I expect to propose moving to Lower Rogue River language)
Tututni
Galice language (which I expect to propose moving to Upper Rogue River language)
Shasta Costa
Rogue River Indians

In addition, I will make some minor edits to other pages to establish a consistent terminology and description across wikipedia:

Template:Athabaskan languages
"Category:Pacific Coast Athabaskan languages"
Template:Languages of Oregon
Athabaskan languages
Coquille people
Coquille Indian Tribe
Tolowa language
Upper Umpqua language
Siletz
Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians

Finally, I intend to create a page for the macro-language which comprises the Lower Rogue River, Upper Rogue River, and Chetco-Tolowa dialect groups, as much recent scholarship, language revitalization efforts, and materials from the tribes refer to them collectively as one language or dialect continuum. I am unsure of the correct name for this page, which is why I'm waiting on creating it. Most of the linguistics collections of languages don't recognize any subgrouping below Oregon Athabaskan, and in fact they tend to conflict even on what the constituent dialects are and what they should be called. The best name for the article, in my opinion, is Nuu-wee-ya as that is the most common designation for the language in a few places on the internet, including in Jaeci Hall's 2021 dissertation on the language which is the most recent authoritative source. My only hesitation is that it's an endonym and relatively new in usage in English, so hasn't been used, as far as I can tell, at all in linguistics outside of the language revitalization subfield. Then again, this being an underdocumented, previously extinct indigenous language undergoing language revitalization, that subfield is perhaps the most relevant place to look.

I'm relatively inexperienced with making major edits to Wikipedia, so I am more than happy to hear peoples concerns, advice or objections and to discuss how best to make these changes, either on my talk page (where I've also posted this) or on the talk pages of any of the individual pages I plan to edit. I will be adding more here before making any major edits to this page, and I will try to be sure the relevant section of my talk page is updated with any of the terminology or phylogenic classification of the language(s) that I propose to make standard across wikipedia. Feel free to reply here or on my talk page with any comments or concerns! Koricind (talk) 23:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]