Talk:Shell Flat

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed Article Deletion (August 2010)

I cannot find "Shell Flat" on the AfD pages for August 1st, 2nd or 3rd, so I will just leave my comment here.

(BTW, a link to the correct AfD page would be helpful.)

I support the article deletion, but for reasons somewhat different than the AfD proposer. In my view, the abandonment of the wind farm project at Shell Flat would be reason to delete the entire section on the Shell Flat Wind Farm, but not the entire article, as the article has another section that deals with "Shell Flat" as a geographic area, having nothing whatsoever to do with the (formerly?) proposed wind farm. Thus, the abandonment of the wind farm would be insufficient, in and of itself, to support AfD of the entire article. However, since the single sentence claim in the geographic section about the area called Shell Flat is totally unsourced, and has remained so for several months, I support deletion of the entire article. Cheers. N2e (talk) 18:54, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Although cancelled, the project was notable and concerns about the it are well covered by media. The project deserves its page. Beagel (talk) 14:55, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]