Talk:Shore railway station

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Essex task force.

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this redirect.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:SouthendPierRailway1.

Merge

Should this page be merged into the Pier railway article. Davidstewartharvey (talk) 17:50, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidstewartharvey Yes. Anyone consulting WP about this railway should not have to visit three separate articles (which must inevitably repeat much info, map, infobox) to learn about a point-to-point shuttle. Good suggestion. -- Verbarson ^talk_edits 16:14, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, none of the articles are so long that a split is necessary. I've added formal merge tags to the articles and noted at Talk:Pier Head railway station (Essex) to discuss it here (to keep discussion in one place - it would be silly to merge one and not the other). Thryduulf (talk) 19:37, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I only found that we had separate articles while trying to improve southend and found it under one of the categories.Davidstewartharvey (talk) 21:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Merging these articles would allow for easier reference and would improve overall clarity. No need for much the same information to be spread across three articles. Adamfamousman (talk) 23:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. The station articles are very small and are stubs. Davidng913 (talk) 00:11, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support - this makes perfect sense to have all three articles in one place. Turini2 (talk) 13:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]