Talk:Silvaco

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 February 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Company Name

I reverted the company name back to Silvaco, Inc. from "Silvaco Group Inc." which is the parent company of Silvaco Inc. and not the software company per se. See https://dockets.justia.com/docket/california/candce/5:2018cv07135/335166 for a reference. MilpitasMonster (talk) 01:17, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declaration of interest

I am an employee of this company. I am aware of the WP guidelines relating to WP:COI and will abide by them. I will do my best to maintain WP:NPOV on this article while contributing to it. --Eamonnca1 (talk) 00:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am an employee of this company. I am aware of the WP guidelines relating to WP:COI and will abide by them. I will do my best to maintain WP:NPOV on this article while contributing to it. ----MilpitasMonster (talk) 23:11, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MilpitasMonster: Thanks for the note. I would suggest you consult your company's policy on online contributions. My own contributions to Wikipedia years ago ran afoul of my company's intended but not articulated policy and might have in part spurred their revision to be more specific = relevant to the modern online environment. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ceyockey: Thanks for the note. I did as you suggested and consulted our policy. --MilpitasMonster (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Simucad merger

I agree that the Simucad article should be merged with this. --Eamonnca1 ^TALK 21:21, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Silvaco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110713072912/http://www.jacksonlewis.com/legalupdates/article.cfm?aid=1412 to http://www.jacksonlewis.com/legalupdates/article.cfm?aid=1412

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]