Talk:Slim Devices

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Radio

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Notable for Open source software?

I don't really consider a company notable for its open-source software just because it has some. I would say that it would be notable if its software were widely used or known, or the company had some other merit beyond just that. Is this company known for anything? --mdd4696 16:37, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. They make music gadgets. They license their software under the GPL. I'm not saying the company is particularly notable, just that in as so far as is it notable, its open distribution is one thing for which it's noted. See Digital audio startup finds edge in open-source code from the EE Times.

I'm not especially committed to this paragraph, so do feel free to change it - Crosbiesmith 21:57, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I added the importance tag; if people expand on the article, we can keep it. Otherwise, I'll nominate it for deletion in a couple weeks. --mdd4696 22:31, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is the software for the slimserver still open source? The EULA for the new slimserver does not allow one to modify or distribute derivative works. See http://www.slimdevices.com/eula.html

Notable for "audiophile" stance

Hi, I'm not really an expert on the company or its products but it seems to me looking at their marketing that they are trying to be notable for a focus on music quality and offering digital audio streaming solutions for people who might consider themselves "audiophiles".

They suggest that the quality of components used and design are aimed to deliver a better than cd player solution to people looking for a wireless media playing product.

Maybe an expert could check and confirm if this is true?

Thanks, Fonoq35

First sentence -> past tense

First sentence should probably read "Slim Devices, Inc. *was* a consumer electronics company..." As of today (30 Jan 2013) The Logitech web site product pages no longer contain any mention of the Slim Devices brand.

Scalveg (talk) 00:49, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]