Talk:Smith v. United States (2013)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Smith v. United States (2013) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site.

peer review

Ok. This is a start but the draft needs more attention. How does this case matter? How has it affected other cases or public policy? Why is it significant. Also, make sure you follow the outline and style of other cases written about in Wikipedia Cassell04 (talk) 01:33, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think that you need to go into depth of the importance of this case earlier. Maybe provide a "case significance" before the "question of the case"? Also, you mention 2013 several times for the same reason. It seems a bit excessive and takes away from the flow of the writing. Furthermore, I think that you should have some more references to reinforce what you are saying as you begin explain to explain the significance. When you look at the other cases, pay attention to how the language draws the audience in and retains their interest. Ssmit216 (talk) 03:01, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a good start, but I'd organize your article more with the headers. Also explain the case a little more, and maybe see if it has any relevance to similar cases and how those were handled. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gavinbbly (talk • contribs) 21:36, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]