Talk:Society of King Charles the Martyr

Anglicanism Mid‑importance

	Society of King Charles the Martyr is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Saints Low‑importance

	Saints portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Saints

User Backnumber1662 may not like the idea of saints, but that is no reason to muck up an article. Fixed some edits. Morgaledth 02:16, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Catholic"

What is meant by the term "Catholic" as applied to this society? Some may think it means it is affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church but that is apparently not the case. -- Beland 21:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In an Anglican context, Catholicism usually means High Church Anglicanism or Anglo-Catholicism, that is, Anglicanism with vestments, ceremonies, and some theology not dissimilar to Roman Catholicism. This is opposed to, for example, Low Church Anglicanism, which is sparser in ceremony, vestments, et cetera. - Anon.

The word "Catholic" must be very carefully handled. The Church of England is the only Catholic Church in England, according to both its own formularies, and English Law. This must be respected. So too, however, must the desire of another denomination to be known as the "Roman Catholic" Church in England. Timothy Titus 12:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems odd that a patron of this Anglican society, Lord Nicholas Windsor has been reputedly received into the Church of Rome. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:43, 19 February 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Later on in the article, the episcopacy is described as 'catholic', which does not even make sense in the sense 'high chuch'. 'Catholic' means universal. Surely the relevant term is 'apostolic'. - 1846, 2 September 2009

Any confusion over the word "Catholic" in an Anglican context can be understood (if not entirely cleared up) by viewing Anglo-Catholic or Oxford Movement. This isn't about what the Roman Church likes to call others or what the English Church likes to call itself, it is about affirming the Catholicity of the Anglican communion, i.e. (and apropos the appearance of this discussion on King Charles's page) the presence of the Historical episcopate in the English Church and the role Charles I played in preserving the historic episcopate and the Catholic faith in Britain. There was a flourishing of the Catholic faith under the Caroline divines, after all - it's part of what drove the Puritans crazy. Roman Catholics and low-church Anglicans alike often are confused about the Church of England's affirmation of its Catholicity (not just its catholicity, as it were), but that is understandable. Morgaledh (talk) 01:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Canonization

This seems to be out of date. Both the Alternative Service Book and Common Worship have restored him to the calendar. Peter jackson (talk) 10:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not out of date, since the Feast of Saint Charles, King and Martyr (which is likely how it would be worded) is still excluded from the BCP. The SKCM still lists having it added and universally recognized as one of their goals. But yes, you're right that it needs to be made clearer in the article that the feast has been added to the ASB and CW. I'll do that. Morgaledh (talk) 01:49, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page Cleanup

Wow, what a mess the section on the American Region was (see the history)! It looked like it was copied and pasted from a minutes report, and listed every single officer and meeting, often multiple times. I streamlined it and fixed the notes in that section, and added an infobox to the article. Morgaledh (talk) 01:49, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sainthood

I've removed the reference in the article to Charles having been canonised. Please see the discussion here. Thanks. Formerip (talk) 22:15, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing it is like removing references to Hitler being a dog-lover; they might not fit with what folks like to think, but doesn't make the facts less factual. But I won't argue, or marshal pages of older Prayer books to "source" the facts. It won't matter, this is par for the course; all I see is someone's ideology winning out. He was called a saint by the Church (i.e. The Feast of St. Charles King and Martyr) until revisions to the prayer book in 1859, which were anti-Catholic and part of the buildup to the Public Worship Regulation Act 1874 which made illegal ritualism. But all this is unnecessary; you don't want his sainthood mentioned, and thus it won't be, and you're a long time editor, which means you have the power. Of course he was considered a saint by the C of E; the fact that such things bother anti-Catholics is of no factual concern. But QED. I remember now why I stopped editing this thing, it's a good reminder not to come back and feed the beast. Cheers! Morgaledh (talk) 03:17, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Society of King Charles the Martyr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090711124502/http://www.skcm.org/index.html to http://www.skcm.org/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See also