Talk:Soulection

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Record Labels

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks an infobox. You may wish to add one, so that the article resembles the standard display for this subject. This talk page may contain the banner of a relevant project, that provides the standardized infobox for this type of article. See also Category:Infobox templates, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes.

What does the article (or section) do well?

The article provides a great amount of detail while also being concise. The article provides visuals that are helpful to the understanding of the reader. The subheadings that you used make the article easy to follow.

What changes would you suggest overall?

I don't really think there was anything wrong with the article. Since this is a rough draft you will add more to the sections. I would just maybe go into more detail about what types of music they are creating or what is the most popular ones.

Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know!

I would say that for my article I need to use more visuals like the ones used in this article. I think that the visuals help the reader understand the topic more clearly. I think for my article I should use some pictures and tables for statistics to help make the article easier to understand. Radacktyler (talk) 16:33, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• What does the article (or section) do well?

I like how you added all the tracks names and talked about each release in the initial sections. I had never heard of this and I feel that after reading what you have so far, I have a good overall understanding of Soulection!

• What changes would you suggest overall?

I like how the founders are different sub sections but I think this could look better if you talk about it under the Founders heading rather than dividing it into different subsections.

• What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? Since I am also working on something directly related to the music industry I would recommend that you add maybe more stuff about - Inspiration - Production - Genre - Charts (if any of these are relatable for your article)

• Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know! I think the degree of your detail explaining everything about apple music and the radio etc.. You give the reader a good understanding overall! Sanahhathiramani (talk) 16:41, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]