This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
The South Africa Act decided that Dutch and English were the official languages. Afrikaans did not extist at those times. Afrikaans became a seperate language from Dutch in 1925 (officially). The Dutch was the official language of the Union of South-Africa till the end of the union in 1961. In 1961 the new Republic replaced Dutch for Afrikaans. Dutch and Afrikaans were synonims till 1983. See: w:nl:Erkenning van Nederlands in Zuid-Afrika and w:af:Erkenning van Afrikaans *use google translate* --I90Christian (talk) 02:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the warning at the top of the article can now be removed, more relevant books having been added and sources quoted Vaaljapie (talk) 06:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]