This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Rather agree with you but, for the moment, have made it rather more NPOV than it was and added some wikilinks to make more sense of it. --VampWillow 00:48, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
As it is, this article doesn't provide much useful information and isn't very encyclopedic at all. It does indeed seem to serve primarily as a tool to advertise the group's existence. I suppose it could be edited into a better article in the future, though. Mr. Billion 04:57, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
What is this group about then? They are anti-buildings? This is a very badly written article. I don't feel I've learnt anything from it.
They're known in some circles for their antics, the article should stay, though be improved. They are not anti-buildings, but rather anti-being-controlled. Against being told what to do by design, which extends to active protest against a number of things which may incidentally have a political edge (e.g. ban on protests within 1 mile of parliament). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 11:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC).