Talk:Spit (album)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tbhotch (talk · contribs). Almost a year in the queue. 07:10, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for starting a review on this article. I thought that the article would never get reviewed. Anyways, what are some things in the article that should be fixed? Statik N (talk) 19:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- These:
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- See below
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Resolved comments from Tbhotch |
---|
;Lead
|
These are the main issues that I found. Article on hold. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 23:09, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Citation 21 doesn't need an issue or volume because it doesn't have those. It's a book. Some of the citations that don't have an issue or volume or page doesn't have issues, volumes, or pages because I couldn't find them. Citation 32's last name is actually spelled as "vanHorn". As for the obscenity controversies in music category, there's the quote in the body: "Spit was controversial because of its song titles, which made many people think that the album's songs are about sex". Statik N (talk) 00:56, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Statik N: For Citation 32 I was referring to a title, not to vanHorn. I was about to approve the GAN, nevertheless, this suddenly happened. I cannot approve an article with an edit-war and the release dates are unsourced (except for "Paperdoll" that is supported by source 40). Resolve the conflict, and ping me when it's done. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 01:49, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
- By the way, Backrish and Charlotte charted on the UK Top 100. This can be mentioned. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 01:57, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
- All single dates are now sourced. I sourced "Charlotte" in the body. Statik N (talk) 02:33, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
- OK then. Article approved. Good work. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 04:06, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
- All single dates are now sourced. I sourced "Charlotte" in the body. Statik N (talk) 02:33, 9 September 2017 (UTC)