User talk:Statik N

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Contents

Disambiguation link notification for March 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited World Coming Down, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chronicles of Chaos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slipknot (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Gray. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

GA Notice[edit]

GA Notice
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Nu metal in which you've been a major contributor, and has been nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

Cambalachero (talk) 16:43, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg · Symbol oppose vote.svg · Symbol wait.svg · Symbol neutral vote.svg

Your GA nomination of Nu metal[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nu metal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cambalachero -- Cambalachero (talk) 17:00, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Through the Eyes copyedit[edit]


Johnny April[edit]

So where does he come in? That needs to be covered, I would think, because April's credited as the album's bassist. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 11:30, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Nu metal[edit]

You've made quite a lot of edits...are you looking at the page opened for the GA review? Do you think they help with what their idea of a GA is? dannymusiceditor Speak up! 20:45, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Broken Home (Papa Roach song)[edit]


Orphaned non-free image File:Blink-182 - California Deluxe Edition.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blink-182 - California Deluxe Edition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Date ranges[edit]

Please re-visit WP:DATERANGE, it has changed. - Mlpearc (open channel) 23:55, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nu metal[edit]

The article Nu metal you nominated as a good article has failed Symbol oppose vote.svg; see Talk:Nu metal for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cambalachero -- Cambalachero (talk) 14:01, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Phil Anselmo and Dimebag Darrell.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Phil Anselmo and Dimebag Darrell.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

The Prodigy[edit]

Did you just remove the alternative dance genre and the source? Please look at this information.

  • Alternative dance<ref>{{Cite news |author = Harrington, Richard|title=A Spark in Electronica? The Alternative Dance Genre Isn't Saving the Music Industry—Yet|work=[[The Washington Post]]|page=G5|date=24 August 1997}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author= Roach, Martin |title= The Prodigy: The Official Story|publisher= Music Press Books|year= 2010 |isbn= 9781906191016}}</ref>

There are 2 sources available.

THANKS

JG

Malmsimp (talk) 12:59, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Sepultura 1992.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Sepultura 1992.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 18:30, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spit (album)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Spit (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 07:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spit (album)[edit]

The article Spit (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Spit (album) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 23:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spit (album)[edit]

The article Spit (album) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Spit (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 04:21, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kittie Charlotte music video.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kittie Charlotte music video.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

IAbot[edit]

I'm not sure if you know about this. Archiving links is now much easier. Since I'm not logged in, I don't have the privilege, but you have access to InternetArchiveBot now. It will do a page for you and take an average of 45-60 seconds. [1] (DME from an IP) 104.39.30.211 (talk) 15:26, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Hoobastank being largely nu-metal?[edit]

Hey, I don't like how you made Hoobastank page article more nu-metal oriented. I think that is unfair because the page was never that nu-metal oriented, it used to say nu-metal for the early stuff but it was always largely a post-grunge/alternative article. When you came to edit the page, you made it like Hoobastank were largely nu-metal. They actually aren't. It's just the first self titled album that has some nu-metal influences, your sources only refer to the self titled album. Hoobastank has 5-6 albums, most of their stuff has nothing to do with nu-metal, they are mostly a post-grunge/alternative rock band with some pop rock hooks. I was wondering if it would be okay if I just add nu-metal as being early because most of the stuff from Hoobastank is mostly post-grunge/alternative rock. They don't do nu-metal at all anymore, it was only some sounds in the self titled album but even the self titled album was mostly post-grunge/alternative rock oriented. Can we agree on this or disagree? Also, ignore those links below( Strangeguy91 (talk) 02:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC) )

Replaceable fair use File:Braid band.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Braid band.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

You did not fix anything by tweaking the non-free use rationale as you did. The band is still active which means its reasonable to expect that a free equivalent can still either be found or created to be used as the primary means of identification per WP:FREER. If you still want to dispute that the file is not replaceable fair use, follow the instructions in the template and use Template:di-replaceable fair use disputed instead. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Emo copyedit[edit]

File:Kittie 2007.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kittie 2007.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 00:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Kittie Dynamo 2000.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kittie Dynamo 2000.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 00:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Kittie 2001.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kittie 2001.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 00:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Poison band.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Poison band.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:36, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Deftones 1997.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Deftones 1997.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Korn-musical-group.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Korn-musical-group.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:18, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Madball band.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Madball band.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:44, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Non-free content use[edit]

From all of the file-related notifications posted on your user talk page, it appears that you're misunderstanding how non-free files are permitted to be used on Wikipedia under its non-free content use policy. While I believe you're uploading these files in good faith, too many of your uploads seem to have problems. This is only a meant as a friendly suggestion, but you might want to slow down a bit and ask for assistance at either WP:MCQ or WT:NFC before uploading any more non-free content, and probably before uploading any image files in general.

Wikipedia takes copyright stuff pretty seriously and while it's understand that mistakes are going to be made in good faith, repeatedly having your file uploads nominated for discussion at WP:FFD or tagged for speedy deletion per WP:F7, etc. is not going to instill confidence in others that you understand enough about copyright and file licensing matters to be considered competent to upload files. Nobody expects you to be a file licensing expert; however, if your uploads keep getting flagged as problematic, it's going to eventually be seen as disruptive, which in turn may lead to an adminsitrator taking steps to prevent and further disruption. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:59, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Avenged Sevenfold metalcore days.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Avenged Sevenfold metalcore days.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 15:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Electronic rock[edit]

Hey, I noticed you editing genre pages. Well, I recently created an article on electronic rock. Now, this article used to exist, but it was changed to electronics in rock music, due to none of the sources explicitly using the term "electronic rock", but I've since found some. What do you think? You could help out if you would like too. Kokoro20 (talk) 23:49, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar.png The Original Barnstar
Although I disagree with this being an actual genre, I appreciate the time and effort you have put into the heavy hardcore article. Very well put together. SuperLuigi22 (talk|contribs) 01:47, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Statik N. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017[edit]

Your recent editing history at Post-punk‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Woovee (talk) 00:36, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emo pop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chorus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Toxicity (album)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Toxicity (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 22:00, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Toxicity (album)[edit]

The article Toxicity (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Toxicity (album) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 22:40, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Toxicity (album)[edit]

The article Toxicity (album) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Toxicity (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 02:02, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Hellbilly Deluxe[edit]

Can you give me a quote or some context of what the book says? I'd prefer not to have the cites in the infobox if at all possible. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 18:24, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

1990s in msuic listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1990s in msuic. Since you had some involvement with the 1990s in msuic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PamD 22:34, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tormented (Staind album)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tormented (Staind album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of IndianBio -- IndianBio (talk) 05:40, 11 June 2018 (UTC)