Talk:Språkförsvaret

Notable at all?[edit]

One mention in Svenska Dagbladet, plus two references which are the organization's own website and blog, all in Swedish, make this organization notable for en.WP? This is nothing more or less than an obsolete political statement. Not encyclopedic. Nothing added for 2 years. Delete! SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:09, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

These people are regularly cited in various media in Sweden. I heard one of their representatives interviewed on the public-service Sveriges Radio just the other morning. They also receive coverage in local English-language media like The Local, e.g. here. They've event made it to the BBC: e.g., here. So they probably pass the test of notable. —Zalktis (talk) 09:58, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:51, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of new claims...[edit]

... have now been added making this article look more than ever like a subjective piece of POV or cause promotion. Reliable inline citations are totally missing. I will be removing just about everything here, except the basic fact that the organization exists and works to protect the Swedish language, unless reliable citations are added very soon to support encyclopedically relevant information. SergeWoodzing (talk) 23:46, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:37, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]