Talk:Statistical hypothesis testing
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Statistical hypothesis testing article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|Archives: 1, 2|
|Statistical hypothesis testing has been listed as a level-4 vital article in Mathematics. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as B-Class.|
|This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details.|
|This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot I. Any threads with no replies in 3 months may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived.|
Common test statistics
I corrected the erroneous last test, ("regression t-test") to a correct F-test. Harald Lang, 2015-11-29.
Does a mans financial responsibility only start when the couple gets married?
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Statistical hypothesis testing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://hops.wharton.upenn.edu/ideas/pdf/Armstrong/StatisticalSignificance.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.
I could be completely wrong about this but looking at the clairvoyant example...
The probability of getting every guess correct (clairvoyantly) is said to be
(1/4)^25 ~= 10^-15
This is basically the 1/4 probability that a card will be of a chosen suit rasied to the power of the number of correctly chosen cards right?
So then the probability of getting between 10 and 25 of the choices correct is the sum of getting exactly 10,11,12,13, etc.. up to 25 choices correct so if I put that into Wolfram's summation widget I get something like 1.26*10^-6, NOT ~= .07 as stated in the article?
Am I missing something here?
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sum+[%2F%2Fmath:%281%2F4%29^k%2F%2F],+[%2F%2Fmath:k%2F%2F],+[%2F%2Fmath:10%2F%2F],+[%2F%2Fmath:25%2F%2F] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 28 October 2016