Jump to content

Talk:Steffan O'Sullivan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger Discussion

[edit]

This article should be merged with FUDGE as the subject fails notability guideline WP:BIO. --Gavin Collins 09:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From WP:BIO:

*Creative professionals: scientists, academics, economists, professors, authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, engineers, and other creative professionals.

He is an established author, so let's proceed from there.

    • The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique.
    • The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.

Check out Fudge (role-playing game). Specifically, Fudge (role-playing game)#Printed Supplements for the Fudge System. I believe this discounts your notability argument. Turlo Lomon 12:37, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also want to add that Bunnies and Burrows is also notable, as proven in that article. This supports the second clause I copied above. Turlo Lomon 15:35, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • As you know, notability is not inherited. This article is too short to demonstrate notability. If the concept, theory or technique was notable, its should follow that there would be a large body of work supporting the claim to notability. I see no evidence of this, although it is always possible that I am mistaken. However, I still propose merger. --Gavin Collins 09:34, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]