Talk:Stephen Sinatra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Thanks for the feedback. I am very new at this (clearly) but eager to learn. Can you provide additional detail on issue with Tone. My goal is to simply provide information on Dr. Sinatra that other might find helpful. Following the model of other posting like Dr. Mercola and Dr. Weil. Thanks for your help.

Id like to see a list of his academic works — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.109.243.159 (talk) 02:02, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The tone is that this reads like an advertisement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.135.151.199 (talk) 23:51, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article still has tone that sounds like an ad. The recently added statements accusing the doctor of pseudoscience are not helpful, as they are not supported.Waltezell (talk) 23:39, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I used find and replace to change Q10 so 10 was a subscript. The find and replace malfunctioned and caused chaotic errors throughout the document. I am thoroughly up to speed on find and replace and know this was a malfunction, not an error on my part. I hope the find and replace utility can be corrected so this doesn't happen again to someone else. It took a long time for me to correct the results.Waltezell (talk) 03:11, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I propose the section on Grounding be deleted, the only references are self-published. Views? FlatOut 05:47, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine is a peer-reviewed journal, not self published.Jonathan108 (talk) 10:14, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That is true, however there are no independent sources and the claim that grounding reduces blood viscosity is an an exceptional claim. Exceptional claims should be referenced with independent sources. FlatOut 10:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Phrasing and tags[edit]

I have modified some of the puffery and exceptional claims and added tags for much of the material that needs non primary reliable sources or WP:MEDRS quality sources. I think the subject just barely meets notability and we need to report what other sources have said, not create (synthesized) content. In particular with BLP and biomedical information anything that appears on WP must be a direct reflection of what has been stated in reliable published sources. - - MrBill3 (talk) 09:42, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Stephen Sinatra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]