Talk:Steyr M
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Steyr M article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Slow down
[edit]The gallery was inappropriate, and I have serious questions about some of the other edits. Slow down. Georgewilliamherbert 20:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with the gallery being inappropriate. What questions do you have about some edits??? I was unhappy with inaccurate information, as well as the general layout of the page, and am trying to clean it up and make 100% accurate ASAP.....
- Unfortunately, I am a newbie.... this will be my first wiki project.... Babj615 19:20, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Designation and variants
[edit]Searching for data on this gun on Steyr's website, I noticed that designations like M9, M40 and M357, as well as its equivalents for the S and C versions, aren't actually used. Those designations present on the website are M-A1, S-A1, L-A1 and C-A1, without the number corresponding to the caliber (9, 40 or 357). Shouldn't this be fixed in the article?
Austria: Spezialeinsatzkräfte
[edit]What are the those so called "Spezialeinsatzkräfte"? EKO Cobra? WEGA? Jagdkommando? Could somebody please explain which "Special force" is referred to here? 81.10.151.214 (talk) 08:46, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Austria articles
- Low-importance Austria articles
- All WikiProject Austria pages
- C-Class Firearms articles
- Low-importance Firearms articles
- WikiProject Firearms articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles