Talk:Strange star

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

‹See TfM›

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

no source and really bad grammar

"While this is of course still theoretical; there is good evidence the researchers from this paper provide that point to the collapse.."

What paper? Is the two on a separate line? Why are the sources not placed where it belongs, and how did something with such bad grammar survive a day on Wikipedia. Someone needs to make this not read like gobbledegook.

Jackhammer111 (talk) 19:52, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jackhammer111 bruh Wikipedia will not be Wikipedia without this Leleakuhonua54114236 (talk) 06:38, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]