Talk:Strophic form

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Music theory, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of music theory, theory terminology, music theorists, and musical analysis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Music theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Music theoryTemplate:WikiProject Music theoryMusic theory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Strophic form be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Modified strophic form

What the hell is "modified strophic?" is it strophic datz modified? O_O yes im stupid =_= —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.112.122.45 (talk) 18:47, 20 September 2007

Removed Paragraph

I removed the paragraph at the bottom of the page seeing as some of the information either had appeared inside the article already. Also, the comment about the comparisons between Theme and Variations and strophic are valid, but there are some large differences, and could lead someone to incorrect conclusions about how stropic form works. Although related, they are exclusive forms. If one wanted to list forms similar to strophic and included several forms, that would work, but a paragraph on the similarities that is as long as the explainiation could be misleading. SteppAN 16:00, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additional citations

Why, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification? Hyacinth (talk) 02:26, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All articles need reliable, third-party sources. This article doesn't have any, which is why it's tagged. Some inline citations would help too. • DP • ^{huh?} 15:05, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]