Talk:Sub Rang Society

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Articles for creation Start‑class

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article was accepted on 15 October 2019 by reviewer Mcmatter (talk · contribs).

CSD

@Atlantic306: would you mind telling me how this doesn't mean G11? Thanks, Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 21:12, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is not blatant advertising, for example it was passed at AFC, please read WP:CSD Atlantic306 (talk) 21:30, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlantic306: that doesn't answer my question. Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 17:51, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is not written in an overly-promotional tone. What exactly do you consider to be written in an ovely promotional tone ? Atlantic306 (talk) 17:55, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlantic306: the article sounds just like it would be written on the website of the subject. This isn't the defining factor, but it does make it feel overly promotional. Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 18:24, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- Ive amended it, but I don't agree that it qualifies for G11. If you consider it to be non-notable then there is prod or AfD available, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:44, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]